Tuesday, February 5, 2019

Final draft of the new Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of the Continuing Professional Development Law of 2016 (CPD Law): Bits of Facts and My Stance



GREAT NEWS! The final draft of the new Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of the Continuing Professional Development Law of 2016 (CPD Law) has been released.

Among the provision of the new IRR includes:

1. Significant decrease in the number of required CPD units for the renewal of professional license. From 45 units, it’s now down to 15 units every three years.

2. In-house trainings and capacity-building activities of government agencies and corporations, including local government units and private employers shall be credited and considered as CPD compliance.

3. CPD is still a mandatory requirement for the renewal of the PRC ID of all registered and licensed professionals.

4. For teachers, there should be an alignment in the CPD forms with the DepEd to lessen the burden of additional paperwork.

During the transition period, the following shall be observed:

- Professionals working abroad shall not be covered by the CPD requirement during the period of their employment abroad.

- Newly licensed professionals shall be exempted from CPD requirements for their first renewal.

- CPD councils shall reduce the required CPD units to a minimum which shall not be more than 15 CPD units.

The following are the pre-conditions of the PRC before they can fully implement the mandatory CPD law:

1. Needs-based capacity building for professional organizations and professionals

2. Assignment of Philippine Qualifications Framework for all professionals with the following appropriate mechanism for awarding of qualifications:

- Standardization of the assessment of learning outcomes with corresponding credit units.

- Crafting of the mechanics for the accumulation of credit units leading to award of qualifications or higher PQF levels.

-Institutionalization of Career Progression and Specialization

3. Upgrade of the CPD Accreditation System

4. Attainment of sufficient number of accredited CPD providers and programs

5. Rationalization of CPD Registration/Seminar Fees

It was agreed during the consultation that until the PRC complies with the pre-conditions, all seminars attended by licensed professionals should be recognized as CPD units and shall be accepted as valid for the renewal of their licenses.

PRC Chairman Teofilo S. Pilando, Jr. said the aforementioned provisions will be in effect until the end to the transition period for RA 10912.

“This resolution will take effect after 15 days following its publication in the Official Gazette or in a newspaper of general circulation, copy furnished the U.P. Law Center,” Pilando said.

“Hopefully once all of these things are met then we will be prepared the mandatory character of the law,” the PRC chair added.







MY STANCE:

BEFORE: (based on my Facebook post last December 12, 2017)
"THIS IS JUST MY OPINION. (I hope you guys would respect it and please don't hate me.)
Possibly, I can complete the CPD because I have a very understanding employer but how about the others who are not financially capable? It's really a fact that some employers are not that supportive of their workers and some employees have low salaries. Our differences really hinder us to have this CPD fruitful. CPD is surely promising but the sad fact is that there are also professionals who can't afford to attend seminars or enroll themselves to graduate school.

It seems that our freedom of choice is useless (or abused maybe) because it's already a mandate and whether we like it or not, we need to obey it... I wanna ask this question again.. How about those who can't afford? Instead of paying for their other financial obligations, they would rather cut their budget just to comply the CPD... you know not all are fortunate enough...Right? We don't only spend money on our professional development, we also need to spend on our daily needs especially that nowadays, the products are too expensive.. mahal ang bigas
mahal ang tubig at kuryente
mahal na ang lahat... 
pati ang magmahal..

Yes. I somewhat agree with this CPD... it's really a big help for us professionals to upgrade and update ourselves but... the question is (again)... how about those who can't afford? It seems that we deprive them of choosing what they really want.. You know if they want to develop then good.. if they don't want to then okay... it's their choice anyway... At the end of the day, it's our choice to develop as professionals, not by anybody else..."


NOW: I am so happy because of this newly released final draft of the new Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of the Continuing Professional Development Law of 2016 (CPD Law). Honestly, I don't have problems with CPD. I just want it to be more realistic and more attainable. Now that the proposed provision and amendment are drafted, I am sure that all professionals here in the Philippines will be the happiest!

Furthermore, I really love the changes especially these two:
1. Significant decrease in the number of required CPD units for the renewal of professional license. From 45 units, it’s now down to 15 units every three years.

2. In-house trainings and capacity-building activities of government agencies and corporations, including local government units and private employers shall be credited and considered as CPD compliance.

I am so grateful to those individuals who have exerted their efforts to make this possible! God is so good and great! 

Source:
TheSummitExpress. (2019). LOOK: Final draft of new Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of CPD Law. Retrieved last February 6, 2019 from https://www.thesummitexpress.com/2019/02/new-irr-cpd-law-released-teachers.html?fbclid=IwAR0qEXTsWcIVfwLWWtso_dirrZDcLeIFtEMmvzlT0ZFsWbE25krwsxmOFBg

Tuesday, January 29, 2019

Wakim and Apey: My PBB Otso Reaction


By: Jolo Van Clyde S. Abatayo, RL



I can feel you two, Apey and Wakim!

APEY.



Honestly, we have similarities. I believe that strong people are sometimes insensitive. Their attitudes and characters are just the products of their gloomy pasts. I can't blame Apey for that. I just hope that she can free herself from the bondage of the past.
I just think that Apey finds it hard to release her pain because it isn’t easy to forgive and forget. Time can ease but only love can suppress. Also, I think she needs someone who can understand her more. She needs someone who can accept her flaws and who is willing to be the catalyst for her to change positively (and that is her brother, Mark). Mark should be more patient. Mark should be more like a placid river who can make Apey feel that with him, there’s always a feeling of being safe and sound. Moreover, it's a good thing that Big Brother/Kuya asks help from a counseling expert. Apey really needs counseling. 

 
WAKIM.

Because of your undeniable intelligence, you feel like it's always the brain that should be the top of everything, that's why you also forget how important it is to use your heart. I know you are starting to realize that.
Also, I think Wakim has a bookish personality. He’s brilliant but he doesn’t know how to go out from his comfort zone (yet) because he believes that reading is the only way to fuel the mind. One thing I can advise to him is that he should learn to understand that there is so much in life that we can’t pick up from reading or being great in academics. He needs to use effectively and efficiently not just his mind but heart in different situations.


There is nothing wrong in being different or being an outcast. I know it is necessary to adapt and fit in but it is also not a sin to be yourself.  I strongly think that these two need to go far! They are just being true to themselves. PBB can be an instrument to metamorphose or change them. I still have my hopes for these two. :)

Thursday, January 24, 2019

Lowering the Criminal Responsibilty: Bits of Facts and My Stance!


By: Jolo Van Clyde S. Abatayo, RL


Bits of FACTS!

Republic Act (RA) 10630 is the law that currently retains the minimum age of criminal liability at 15 but allows children as young as 12 to be detained in youth care facilities or Bahay Pag-asa for serious crimes only such as rape, murder, and homicide, among others. This law formerly amended RA 9344 or the Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006, which sets the age of criminal responsibility at 15 years old (Cepeda, 2019).

Last January 21, 2019, the Committee on Justice submitted a report regarding the proposed amendment of RA 10630 which is the House Bill No. 8858. It aims to lower the criminal responsibility of children to 9 years old. However, on Wednesday, January 23, 2019, the house has decided to alter the provision. Instead of lowering it to 9 years old, they’ve changed it to 12 years old.


Bits of my STANCE!

Since I am a librarian and a professional, I always do research before reacting to the different political issues the country is facing right now. I want to talk more about the proposed minimum criminal liability age that is one of the gigantic political concerns in the country. Before, I really don’t have an idea about it so I kept myself silent, but because I have read legit articles or write-ups about the proposed amendments of the existing law, Republic Act (RA) 10630, I have become so interested and curious (real quick) about it. (I would like to thank the official gazette too for the republic acts).

Honestly, I don’t have a problem with it because if we look at the reality, it is so rampant that there are many cases right now about children abusing the law. This amendment will just serve as a discipline against children who are not afraid to disobey the law. It will also serve as a very painful slap and spank to the parents, guardians, teachers, churches, and other concerned individuals or institutions who are not doing their part in transforming these juveniles into law-abiding citizens.   Furthermore, it is not stated in the bill that the children who will be found guilty will be put in jail. In fact, they will be sent to reformative institutions. The treatments will not be the same as what adult criminals are experiencing. The aim of it is to discipline and metamorphose them! Also, there are many countries who have lower criminal responsibility age than the proposed one. To wrap it up... I'm OK with it! Let's make it happen coz I don't like to bet my hopes for this country to children who can't be tamed!


Here are some of the Asian countries are faring in terms of setting the minimum age of holding their juvenile offenders accountable for crimes committed:

1. INDONESIA (from 8 to 12 years old)
Indonesia's law set the age of criminal responsibility to 8 years old.
However, a new law on the Juvenile Justice System came to force in 2014 which increases the minimum age of trial from 8 to 12 years old. The new law also encourages the use of restorative justice practices among others.
[Source: UNICEF.org]

2. THAILAND (7 years old) 
In Thailand, criminal responsibility starts when the child is older than 7 years old. But while the child cannot be punished until he is over 14 years old, the court has the power to decide whether to release him to his parents or guardians under certain conditions or send him to a training school for a designated period, among others. 

3. MALAYSIA (10 years old)
The Penal Code set the age of criminal responsibility to 10 years old. But the Syariah Criminal Offences Act of 1997 states that children are held criminally responsible from the onset of puberty, while crimes under the Internal Security Act can be prosecuted regardless of age.

4. SINGAPORE (7 years old)
The Penal Code in Singapore set the age of criminal responsibility at 7 years old. Child offenders aged 16-17 are tried as adults.

5. VIETNAM (14 years old)
The current age for criminal responsibility in Vietnam is at 14. Child offenders aged 14 and older are criminally responsible for very serious crimes while children 16 or older are criminally liable for any offense.

6. CAMBODIA (14 years old)
While the age of criminal responsibility in Cambodia is at 14, child offenders are usually tried as adults and mixed with adults while in detention.
But this is what the new Juvenile Justice Law that was passed in 2016 hopes to address in treating children in conflict with the law.
[Source: UNICEF Cambodia]

7. MYANMAR, (7 years old)
Under Myanmar's Child Law, children above 7 to 12 years old may be held criminally responsible if they have "attained sufficient maturity of understanding to judge the nature and consequences" of their conduct.

8. BRUNEI (7 years old)
Brunei's Penal code states that children 7 to 12 can be criminally responsible where they have attained sufficient maturity of understanding to judge the nature and consequences of their actions at the time of the offense.

9. LAOS (15 years old)
Children who committed an offense cannot be held criminally liable if they are under the age of 15.

10. JAPAN (14 years old)
Children can be held responsible for a crime committed if they are 14 years old and above. It also sets the minimum age at 14 where the child shall be subjected to detention during process of investigation.

11. Hong Kong (10 years old)
The Juvenile Offenders Ordinance of Hong Kong states that no children under the age of 10 can be found guilty of a crime. A juvenile court shall have jurisdiction to hear and establish a charge against a child.

12. South Korea (14 years old)
The current age of criminal responsibility in South Korea is at 14. However, the government is seeking to lower this to 13 following rising violent incidents involving the youth.
[Source: youthpolicy.org] 

13. China (14 to 16 years old)
Article 17 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China set the age of criminal responsibility at 16 years old. However, children who reached 14 and committed serious crimes such as homicide, rape, robbery, drug trafficking, arson, explosion or poisoning will be held criminally liable.


"Hey! You! Yes, you! What are your thoughts on this matter? Please let me know!"



References:
·        rappler.com
·        officialgazette.gov.ph
·        news.abs-cbn.com


Tuesday, January 15, 2019

The Happy Apey: My PBB Otso Reaction


By: Jolo Van Clyde S. Abatayo, RL

Pinoy Big Brother Abs-Cbn is a popular reality show here in the Philippines. The word "Pinoy" is an informal term used by many here in the country to describe the Filipinos. PBB was first aired last August 21, 2005 on ABS-CBN, one of the biggest Television Networks in Ph. The tagline for the series is "Ipakita Mo ang Tunay Na Ikaw" or in the English language, "Show the Real You".

The show continuously creates a concussion to the multitudinous viewers inside and outside the country. It is even considered as one of the most successful and longest running reality shows in the Philippines because the people are crazy about it and what makes it more interesting is because some of the housemates are already influential or public figures. Also, there are housemates who have amazing characters or personalities that really attract the audiences. The Big Winner will be determined on the choice of the majority of viewers and it is done through text votes.

I can say that, before, I was not really that spirited on this show. You know ,reality shows aren't a big deal for me, however, because of this PBB Otso (Adult Edition), I feel like it is nice to observe or study human attitudes, emotions, and behaviors. This blog is all about my reaction and criticism on the housemates based on what I can observe from them daily. I know I don't have the right to judge them because I don't know them personally and deeply, but I still have my democratic rights to express out my mind. 


Let's start with the HAPPY APEY!


I think she's a strong woman who has a colorful personality. She's funny. However, based on the videos that I've watched, I think she’s insensitive. You can actually see it through how he handles the conflict between her and Yamyam. I can say that strong people are sometimes insensitive because they are very vocal and firm in their ideals. I think we have similarities because I consider myself a strong warrior and I sometimes have this attitude of being so insensitive, but I am trying to be empathetic as much as possible. I can also observe that Apey is not a good listener. The way she communicates with other housemates is unacceptable. I know she is just being true to herself but she must also consider the feelings of other housemates. I think she needs to learn how to be open-minded. I also believe that her egoistic attitude could lead her to downfall.   

Moreover, in her problem with Marie, I think she's going too far already. I know that she can relate to Marie because she is also longing for her father but I think it is not a good thing to put your feet to others' shoes. According to our Professor in our MLIS Subject, Personal Mastery and Human Inquiry, it is not right to give partial or sudden advice and judgment to people if you're not an expert in counseling. We have differences when it comes to coping mechanisms that's why counseling is very complicated. It must be done in a proper way. To all of you, be very careful in accepting and giving advice from random people. Words are deadly and powerful!

I just hope that Apey will realize her mistakes. She needs to change her murky attitudes for her to go far. You know the audiences hold her fate. I still have my high hopes with her though. Please open your eyes and heart, Apey.



Next: The Bizarre Wakim!


See ya on my next blog!


References:
For the Photos:
https://www.facebook.com/PBBabscbntv

Wednesday, December 12, 2018

Cybercrime Law, Freedom of Information, and Free Internet Access: Their Implications to Libraries

By Jolo Van Clyde S. Abatatyo, RL

Libraries have always been about giving people access to the knowledge they need to take on the world. Through promoting literacy, innovation, and creativity, they empower users to discover new perspectives for themselves, find better jobs, and generate new ideas. These are the foundations of a strong society (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions, 2018).

 

CYBERCRIME LAW

Libraries play a very significant role in battling against cybercrime. I believe that we are already acquainted of this delinquency because it is so conspicuous nowadays and there is a lot of cases relevant to this matter. As librarians, we should serve as armaments of our users against cybercrime. We must educate them about how important it is to use the internet, the web, and the social media as platforms for learning and doing rewarding activities.

It is really a sad fact that more and more people commit cyber crimes such as cyberbullying, cyberstalking, cyber warfare, child pornography, extortion, fraud, hacking, identity theft, phishing, phreaking, ransomware, spamming, theft and embezzlement, creating and sharing computer virus, and many more. According to the news, cases of cybercrime in the Philippines continue to spike and soar! A student in Bago City, Negros Occidental even ended his life because of cyberbullying.  It is very terrifying to know that there are now countless cases about cybercrime and the effects of it really destroy lives. It is true that the internet is now a haven for criminals and anarchic individuals.

Some would blame the technology because they think that it is the root of this form of evil. I think it is not appropriate to put the blame on the technology, the internet, and other technological advancements because I strongly believe that it’s the irresponsible, unethical, and lawless people who are malevolent and are not afraid to destroy lives are the ones who need to pay the price! Good thing there is now a law here in the Philippines against cybercrime. It is the Republic Act No. 10175 or the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012. It’s an act defining cybercrime, providing for the prevention, investigation, suppression, and the imposition of penalties therefor and for other purposes. I strongly believe that as librarians, we should really familiarize this law so that we can inform our patrons about this rampant problem which our society is facing right now. We should start it within ourselves so that we can harmoniously apply it when we serve our dear clients in the library.

In our libraries, we provide computer units and internet connection for educational and research purposes but there are users who go beyond the limits. Our library patrons expect to have a safe computing milieu. We, librarians, should be knowledgeable about this matter and must educate our users about its disadvantages. To be specific, here are some of the ways that libraries can do to prevent cybercrime:

·Execute regular anti-malware and anti-virus scanning

·Install firewalls

·Prohibit users from downloading and uploading inappropriate contents

·Intensify data and information security

·Educate the users on safe browsing, protecting and strengthening passwords, and other secured internet navigation techniques

·Monitor the usage of WiFi

Students nowadays are already expert in hacking, creating a computer virus, and doing illegal activities that harm people. For us librarians, it is really a concern because we are information professionals and one of our responsibilities is to provide the right information to them. It is now the time for us to meddle and take charge to help solve this problem because if we don’t, the world will not become a better place to live in.

As librarians, we have the role for nation building and empowerment. We should stand and fight against this widespread crime. Moreover, let us be more aware of the latest trends in cybersecurity and be more keen in educating our users on how to secure their information. I strongly believe that we have the power to save more lives if we heartily educate our patrons. Most importantly, we should make them realize that it is necessary to think first before clicking.

 

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION (FOI)

We, the sovereign Filipino people have the ultimate right to know everything associated with our government. We have the freedom to keep an eye on the different involvements related to our regime and its members. According to the Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines, the proposed Freedom of Information (FOI) Act aims to mandate the disclosure of public documents. It also outlines the exceptions for public disclosure and the procedures for accessing public documents.

In the library setting, as librarians, we need to empower transparency. This FOI is very applicable in our libraries since we have the freedom to know every information we want. However, we should also understand that censorship is necessary for our libraries because not all kinds of information are allowed to be accessed and retrieved. When your users are children or young adults, you can’t let them access restricted sites that contain pornographic, obscene, or violent types of information. There are many things to consider and as librarians, we should really understand this freedom of information and reflect on what is its impact on our libraries especially to our users.

This freedom of information is a manifestation that every Filipino has the right to know what is happening in our government right now. I strongly believe that when there’s transparency, everything will go smoothly and we can avoid conflict. Like in libraries, our patrons demand fairness and truthfulness and they should be provided with the right information they need when they go to the library. I think that in the library, freedom should be practiced because our valued patrons have the right to avail the services and utilize the resources of the library harmoniously. If the librarian isn’t fervent enough to serve them just like helping them retrieve the information they need, then the librarian is not genuinely and professionally doing its role.

Generally, greater access to information empowers citizens to hold their public officials accountable and to participate in government processes that are being opened to them by the administration. The same goes with the library because if the users can access sufficient amount of information, they can be the best that they can always be and they can make a difference in every endeavor they will have in their lives.

 

FREE INTERNET ACCESS

This is somewhat relevant to the anti-cybercrime law because what happens on the internet are now covered by the law that prevents us from doing cybercrimes. As what I have said, cybercrime is an endemic problem we are facing today. Illegal activities are not only happening in the real world. For the criminals or evildoers, the Internet is their gateway to commit crimes and harm other people.

In our libraries, we only want what’s best for our clients, that’s why we always make sure that we provide everything they need for them to access and retrieve the information they want in the easiest and fastest way. The internet is indeed a magnificent instrument for them to do things related to their studies and researches. Our libraries provide free internet access because we are now in the modern world and not all kinds of information are present in the physical formats stored in the library such as books, periodicals, audiovisual materials, and many more. We can now access as fast as we can the information we want with the help of computers and the internet.

However, not all people are responsible enough. There are individuals who use the internet in doing unnecessary things like watching pornography, cyberbullying, creating troubles using social media, and many more. I believe that we, librarians should make some policies and rules about internet access in the library. I am more favored if we limit the purpose of the internet in the library like we should only allow them to use it for educational and research purposes only. We should monitor our users because we never know what harmful things that will happen to them if we will just let them do the things that they want. We should guide them and educate them that everything will be alright if we use the internet for good.

 Indeed, the Internet is the largest library in the world but the librarians are the best navigators who can help you safely explore the ocean of information and accurately catch the right fishes!



MORE ABOUT THE FOI: Question and Answer Portion (From the Official Gazette of the Philippines)

Who can ask for information?

Every Filipino citizen.

To whom can we ask for information?

All government agencies (specifically defined under section 3 of the proposed bill).

What information will be made available?

All information pertaining to official acts, transactions, or decisions, as well as government research data used as a basis for policy development, regardless of its physical form or format.

What information will remain classified?

  • Information specifically authorized to be kept the secret under guidelines established by an executive order, and properly classified.
  • The records of minutes and advice given and opinions expressed during decision-making or policy formulation, invoked by the Chief Executive to be privileged by reason of the sensitivity.
  • Information pertaining to internal and/or external defense, law enforcement, and border control.
  • Drafts of orders, resolutions, decisions, memoranda, or audit reports by any executive, administrative, regulatory, constitutional, judicial, or quasi-judicial body.
  • Information obtained by any committee of either house of Congress in executive session.
  • Personal information of a natural person other than the requesting party.
  • Information pertaining to trade secrets and commercial or financial information that would seriously prejudice industrial, financial, or commercial competition.
  • Information classified as privileged communications in legal proceedings by law or by the Rules of Court.
  • Information exempted by law or the Constitution.

What are the advantages of this bill compared to the prior bills filed in Congress?

  • This proposed bill expands access to financial information, such as SALNs of government officials, and access to other kinds of information, such as transactions by incorporating a provision making the posting/publication mandatory.
  • The public is spared the tedious work of trying to access certain information from different agencies when the information is made available in one portal, the Official Gazette website (www.officialgazette.gov.ph) being the official publication for the following information:

– Important legislative acts and resolutions of a public nature of the Congress of the Philippines;
– Executive and administrative orders and proclamations of general application;
– Decisions or abstracts of decisions of the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals or other courts of similar rank, as may be deemed of sufficient importance to be so published;
– Such documents or classes of documents as the President shall determine to have general application.

  • The bill asks government agencies to translate key information into major Filipino languages and present them in popular form and means. 
  • All government agencies are required to prepare a Freedom of Information Manual that will contain details and procedures and serve as a guide on the matter.
  • The bill integrates open data provisions, which mandates a regular and pro-active release of government data in open and machine-readable formats.

Procedure of access

1.     Request

Submit a request to the government agency concerned either personally, by mail, or through electronic means.

2.     Receiving

The request will be stamped by the government agency, indicating the date, time, and other details of receipt. In case the request is submitted by electronic means, the government agency shall provide for an equivalent means by which the requirements shall be met.

3.     Waiting time

The government agency shall comply with such a request as soon as practicable, and in any case within 15 working days from receipt. The period may be extended for specific cases.

4.     Notification

The government agency shall, in writing or through electronic means, notify the person making the request of the extension, the reasons for the extension, and the date the information will be made available (no more than 20 working days).

5.     Grant and Payment

Once a decision is made to grant the request, the person making the request shall be notified of such and pay the required access and processing fees.

What will happen if my request is not granted?

  • The government agency shall notify the person making the request of such denial in writing or through electronic means within 15 working days from the receipt of the request.
  • The notice shall clearly set forth the ground for denial and the circumstances on which the denial is based. Failure to notify shall be deemed a denial of the request for access to information.
  • Following the proper procedure, denial of a request for access to information may be appealed to the head of the agency, then Ombudsman, then a verified petition for mandamus may be filed in the proper court.
  • The Judiciary shall, however, will be governed by such remedies as promulgated by the Supreme Court.

Is the Admin Bill a watered down version of the previously filed bills in Congress?

  • No. The Admin Bill, in fact, expanded the list of mandatory information for disclosure, provided a specific procedure for access, stated the exemptions in a very clear and transparent manner, and directed that the exemptions are to be strictly construed.

What is the status of FOI?

  • Now that the FOI has been approved on the committee level in both the Senate and House, the bill will be taken up in plenary.

How does FOI relate to the other governance reforms under the Aquino Good Governance and Anti-Corruption Plan 2012-2016?

  • Greater access to information will, in general, empower citizens to hold their public officials accountable and to participate in government processes that are being opened to them by this administration. For instance, greater access to information on government projects through open governance initiatives such as Open Data Philippines will allow civil society organizations to make more meaningful and accurate inputs to the Participatory Budget and Participatory Audit processes that this administration has initiated. The mandatory posting of SALNs will also empower our government investigators and their citizen-partners to run after corrupt officials.
Sources
(1) Senate Bill No. 1733
(2) House Bill No. 3237
(3) 1987 Constitution

(4) Proposed bill – FOI Act of 2013

Librarians as Contemporary Custodians of Heroism (With Extra Spice)

  Today is Heroes Day, the day we commemorate Jose Rizal's piercing pen, Andres Bonifacio's bolo, and Gabriela Silang's unflinch...